Résultat 1 - 10 sur 1297
En cette semaine de premier tour, 404 est plus calme que d'habitude, pour cause de suractivité dans d'autres domaines (on arrive, on arrive). Mais on ne peut s'empêcher de coller un lien vers le livre "Ruptures", du vice-président au tribunal de Paris et président de la 12e Chambre correctionnelle Serge Portelli.En cette semaine de premier tour, 404 est plus calme que d'habitude, pour cause de suractivité dans d'autres domaines (on arrive, on arrive). Mais on ne peut s'empêcher de coller un lien vers le livre "Ruptures", du vice-président au tribunal de Paris et président de la 12e Chambre correctionnelle Serge Portelli.Vu sur le site du think tank LA FORGE
Â
Â
Serge Portelli est l’auteur de plusieurs ouvrages dont “Récidivistes. Chroniques de l’humanité ordinaire“, Grasset, 2008, “Ruptures“, publié en 2007 sur www.betapolitique.fr , “Traité de démagogie appliquée. Sarkozy, la récidive et nous“,
Michalon, 2006. Il était l’invité de la Forge pour débattre du sujet
“nouvelles surveillances, nouvelles punitions” à l’initiative du groupe
de travail “Cultures et libertés, pour une société du libre arbitre”.
L'invité de la Forge : Serge PORTELLI (magistrat)
envoyé par la-forge
Nouvelles punitions, nouvelles surveillancesLa
thématique de l’insécurité a pris une force particulière aux dernières
élections françaises cependant que la recherche sociologique démontre
l’écart entre l’obsession sécuritaire et les menaces objectives pesant
sur les biens et les personnes dans notre société (1). Robert Castel
rappelle toutefois que cette thématique traduit un rapport à l’Etat
intrinsèquement contradictoire : « l’Etat de droit ne peut que décevoir
cette demande de protection totale car la sécurité totale n’est pas
compatible avec le respect absolu des formes légales » ; « Un Etat
démocratique ne peut être protecteur à tout prix parce que ce prix
serait celui de l’absolutisme du pouvoir d’Etat »(2) .
L’adoption d’un certain nombre de réformes semble signer la
déconstruction progressive d’un socle historiquement constitué de
principes à valeur supérieure régissant le droit français. Ces
principes, que vous évoquez dans votre ouvrage Ruptures (séparation des
pouvoirs, non rétroactivité des lois, atténuation de la responsabilité
pénale des mineurs, respect de la vie privée, individualisation de la
peine, présomption d’innocence, droit d’asile…) seraient remis en cause
au point de bouleverser l’économie générale du droit. Ces « ruptures »
interrogent dans le même temps la conduite d’une politique dont la
charge essentielle consisterait à référer à des discours dits experts
pour légitimer l’identification de populations cibles assimilées aux «
classes dangereuses » (3) , produire les outils d’un repérage confinant
au fichage et créer des dispositifs inédits de gestion de la déviance,
objectifs chiffrés à l’appui. Certaines catégories de populations (les
malades mentaux, les étrangers, les pauvres) se verraient dès lors «
pénalisées » a maxima, ou « présumés dangereux » a minima, en face de
leurs doubles inversés (les « entrepreneurs » bénéficiant de la
dépénalisation relative du droit des affaires, les victimes de la
délinquance, les victimes de discriminations).
L’hypothèse d’une fissuration du socle de valeurs fondamentalement
démocratiques ayant imprimé durablement l’ensemble normatif français
procède à notre sens d’une conception selon laquelle ON PEUT et ON DOIT
déduire le droit du fait. Une telle conception entretient une double
illusion: d’une part, elle postule l’univocité de l’expertise appliquée
à la réalité sociale et d’autre part, elle nie le statut du politique,
en tant qu’il organise un espace de confrontation de valeurs
concurrentes. Quelle idéologie politique – qui en refuse les attraits –
cette conception légitime-t-elle ?
Question 1 : Quelle conception politique les nouvelles punitions et surveillances légitiment-t-elles ?
Question 2 : De quelle conception de l’ordre social et de l’ordre public les réformes récentes relèvent-elles ?
Question 3 : En quoi s’insèrent-elles dans une vision libérale de
l’Etat (conception de la liberté, interventionnisme de l’Etat) ?
Question 4 : En quoi les réformes récentes entretiennent-elles une
confusion entre la compréhension des inégalités sociales et la
moralisation des conduites individuelles ?
The web and the blogs have, as never ever before, played a significant role in the French presidential elections. This has forever impacted the political strategies in this country and has set a benchmark for some. The web is very popular with the French : one out of 2 french citizens is connected to the web and France has 4 million blogs. Worldwide nothing new. As local political lifes goes on - in Italy, in Israel, in China and in many countries - the local experiences can benefit people and candidates everywhere. In the US, the presidential election of 2008 has already seen a number of initiatives on both sides : Barack Obama, John Edwards, John Mc Cain, and some severe attacks on Hilary Clinton. I have heard that some candidates have created virtual worlds on Second Life. In France, political parties have realized the importance of the web when France said NO to the European Consitution, in 2005 : as Jean Philippe Clement put it : "the media said yes, and the web said no". So here is how the web 2.0 strategies were put in play during this french presidential campaign.
A few facts about the web in the campaign
- The 4 leading candidates in France operated their websites with real success : Sarkozy, Royal , Bayrou , and Le Pen.
- Each of their parties put up mash-ups from Google Maps to allow supporters to register directly to share a political action or join a group.
- See a map of the french blogoshere here.
- All french leading magazines and dailies opened weblogs for writers and popular individuals.
- IFOP conducted a survey in February : 47% of internet surfers are looking for political information on the web. This is particularly true of people above 35 years old, not of the younger ones. Download the research here.
- 21% of polled french citizens trust blogs as a source of information (Source Ipsos).
- The traffic of the political weblogs increased by 250% according to FranceInfo (May 5th, 2007).
- Out of the top 6 most influencial french blogs, 5 relate directly (Versac, Bayrou, embruns) or comment occasionnally (Loic le Meur, Point Blog) politics and the presidential campaign.
- The webcasts distributed through the leading video platform are a good benchmark. Segolene's message has been seen 44 000 times. The "promotional" video of Sarkozy and the 21 children taken hostage, 300 000 times.
How did the 2 leading candidates built their web strategy?
Segolene Royal engaged in a viral strategy, stimulating the discussion while Sarkozy was focusing on his own site, creating his own web TV - NSTV, putting up a lot of content and focusing on his program. The web budget of Segolene Royal amounted to € 1.2 million. Her team put together a map of the supporting blogs. See below. She had 40 moderators sorting out the messages and ideas and pull from it major ideas and messages. Nonetheless, her campaign could not fill in the gaps left by her own program. Sarkozy launched his web strategy quite early in 2006. Sarkozy had a supporter's club very active in the campaign. Loic Le Meur, the french most influencial blogger regardless of the last ranking, participated unofficially but actively in that campaign, advising Sarkozy, suggesting video interviews, inviting him to speak at "Le Web 3.0", taking stances on his own blog and congratulating him for his election 1 hour before the results were published.
In the end, the web was smartly used by both candidates, but one used it as a technique, while the other leveraged it around his program. The one with the strongest focus won and his web strategy breathed that focus. But the web did not change history, nor did it replace the power of television. A final note : in his first speach after his election, there was an inscription behind him : sarkozy.fr. Read more from here, Jacques Seguela et Thierry Saussez' point of view,
Segolene's Royal map of supporting blogs. 
En cette semaine de premier tour, 404 est plus calme que d'habitude, pour cause de suractivité dans d'autres domaines (on arrive, on arrive). Mais on ne peut s'empêcher de coller un lien vers le livre "Ruptures", du vice-président au tribunal de Paris et président de la 12e Chambre correctionnelle Serge Portelli.The web and the blogs have, as never ever before, played a significant role in the French presidential elections. This has forever impacted the political strategies in this country and has set a benchmark for some. The web is very popular with the French : one out of 2 french citizens is connected to the web and France has 4 million blogs. Worldwide nothing new. As local political lifes goes on - in Italy, in Israel, in China and in many countries - the local experiences can benefit people and candidates everywhere. In the US, the presidential election of 2008 has already seen a number of initiatives on both sides : Barack Obama, John Edwards, John Mc Cain, and some severe attacks on Hilary Clinton. I have heard that some candidates have created virtual worlds on Second Life. In France, political parties have realized the importance of the web when France said NO to the European Consitution, in 2005 : as Jean Philippe Clement put it : "the media said yes, and the web said no". So here is how the web 2.0 strategies were put in play during this french presidential campaign.
A few facts about the web in the campaign
- The 4 leading candidates in France operated their websites with real success : Sarkozy, Royal , Bayrou , and Le Pen.
- Each of their parties put up mash-ups from Google Maps to allow supporters to register directly to share a political action or join a group.
- See a map of the french blogoshere here.
- All french leading magazines and dailies opened weblogs for writers and popular individuals.
- IFOP conducted a survey in February : 47% of internet surfers are looking for political information on the web. This is particularly true of people above 35 years old, not of the younger ones. Download the research here.
- 21% of polled french citizens trust blogs as a source of information (Source Ipsos).
- The traffic of the political weblogs increased by 250% according to FranceInfo (May 5th, 2007).
- Out of the top 6 most influencial french blogs, 5 relate directly (Versac, Bayrou, embruns) or comment occasionnally (Loic le Meur, Point Blog) politics and the presidential campaign.
- The webcasts distributed through the leading video platform are a good benchmark. Segolene's message has been seen 44 000 times. The "promotional" video of Sarkozy and the 21 children taken hostage, 300 000 times.
How did the 2 leading candidates built their web strategy?
Segolene Royal engaged in a viral strategy, stimulating the discussion while Sarkozy was focusing on his own site, creating his own web TV - NSTV, putting up a lot of content and focusing on his program. The web budget of Segolene Royal amounted to € 1.2 million. Her team put together a map of the supporting blogs. See below. She had 40 moderators sorting out the messages and ideas and pull from it major ideas and messages. Nonetheless, her campaign could not fill in the gaps left by her own program. Sarkozy launched his web strategy quite early in 2006. Sarkozy had a supporter's club very active in the campaign. Loic Le Meur, the french most influencial blogger regardless of the last ranking, participated unofficially but actively in that campaign, advising Sarkozy, suggesting video interviews, inviting him to speak at "Le Web 3.0", taking stances on his own blog and congratulating him for his election 1 hour before the results were published.
In the end, the web was smartly used by both candidates, but one used it as a technique, while the other leveraged it around his program. The one with the strongest focus won and his web strategy breathed that focus. But the web did not change history, nor did it replace the power of television. A final note : in his first speach after his election, there was an inscription behind him : sarkozy.fr. Read more from here, Jacques Seguela et Thierry Saussez' point of view,
Segolene's Royal map of supporting blogs.
En cette semaine de premier tour, 404 est plus calme que d'habitude, pour cause de suractivité dans d'autres domaines (on arrive, on arrive). Mais on ne peut s'empêcher de coller un lien vers le livre "Ruptures", du vice-président au tribunal de Paris et président de la 12e Chambre correctionnelle Serge Portelli.En cette semaine de premier tour, 404 est plus calme que d'habitude, pour cause de suractivité dans d'autres domaines (on arrive, on arrive). Mais on ne peut s'empêcher de coller un lien vers le livre "Ruptures", du vice-président au tribunal de Paris et président de la 12e Chambre correctionnelle Serge Portelli.The web and the blogs have, as never ever before, played a significant role in the French presidential elections. This has forever impacted the political strategies in this country and has set a benchmark for some. The web is very popular with the French : one out of 2 french citizens is connected to the web and France has 4 million blogs. Worldwide nothing new. As local political lifes goes on - in Italy, in Israel, in China and in many countries - the local experiences can benefit people and candidates everywhere. In the US, the presidential election of 2008 has already seen a number of initiatives on both sides : Barack Obama, John Edwards, John Mc Cain, and some severe attacks on Hilary Clinton. I have heard that some candidates have created virtual worlds on Second Life. In France, political parties have realized the importance of the web when France said NO to the European Consitution, in 2005 : as Jean Philippe Clement put it : "the media said yes, and the web said no". So here is how the web 2.0 strategies were put in play during this french presidential campaign.
A few facts about the web in the campaign
- The 4 leading candidates in France operated their websites with real success : Sarkozy, Royal , Bayrou , and Le Pen.
- Each of their parties put up mash-ups from Google Maps to allow supporters to register directly to share a political action or join a group.
- See a map of the french blogoshere here.
- All french leading magazines and dailies opened weblogs for writers and popular individuals.
- IFOP conducted a survey in February : 47% of internet surfers are looking for political information on the web. This is particularly true of people above 35 years old, not of the younger ones. Download the research here.
- 21% of polled french citizens trust blogs as a source of information (Source Ipsos).
- The traffic of the political weblogs increased by 250% according to FranceInfo (May 5th, 2007).
- Out of the top 6 most influencial french blogs, 5 relate directly (Versac, Bayrou, embruns) or comment occasionnally (Loic le Meur, Point Blog) politics and the presidential campaign.
- The webcasts distributed through the leading video platform are a good benchmark. Segolene's message has been seen 44 000 times. The "promotional" video of Sarkozy and the 21 children taken hostage, 300 000 times.
How did the 2 leading candidates built their web strategy?
Segolene Royal engaged in a viral strategy, stimulating the discussion while Sarkozy was focusing on his own site, creating his own web TV - NSTV, putting up a lot of content and focusing on his program. The web budget of Segolene Royal amounted to € 1.2 million. Her team put together a map of the supporting blogs. See below. She had 40 moderators sorting out the messages and ideas and pull from it major ideas and messages. Nonetheless, her campaign could not fill in the gaps left by her own program. Sarkozy launched his web strategy quite early in 2006. Sarkozy had a supporter's club very active in the campaign. Loic Le Meur, the french most influencial blogger regardless of the last ranking, participated unofficially but actively in that campaign, advising Sarkozy, suggesting video interviews, inviting him to speak at "Le Web 3.0", taking stances on his own blog and congratulating him for his election 1 hour before the results were published.
In the end, the web was smartly used by both candidates, but one used it as a technique, while the other leveraged it around his program. The one with the strongest focus won and his web strategy breathed that focus. But the web did not change history, nor did it replace the power of television. A final note : in his first speach after his election, there was an inscription behind him : sarkozy.fr. Read more from here, Jacques Seguela et Thierry Saussez' point of view,
Segolene's Royal map of supporting blogs.